The Trust argued that continuing such treatment was not in YD’s best interests, given the medical prognosis and burdens of ongoing care. Notably, YD’s partners spoke of his strong faith in spiritual healing, his value for life, and his belief in perseverance through adversity. Best Interests Test:Central to the Court of Protection’s task was the determination of YD’s best interests under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. • Best Interests Not Demonstrated: The court concluded that withdrawal of CANH was not proven to be in YD’s best interests. The strong and heartfelt testimony of YD’s partners, coupled with their daily engagement with him, supported the continuation of care.