None
EN
Home Equity Investment and Shared Appreciation Agreements as Reverse Mortgages in Washington – Olson v. Unison Agreement Corporation
[]
Recent Contributors to The National Law Review
As a result, the key question for the court was whether the HEI agreement actually constituted a reverse mortgage loan under the WCLA.
To exercise the purchase option, the HEI provider must make an additional payment of $194,250 to the borrower.
The homeowners’ may cancel the HEI agreement and terminate the HEI provider’s option right only after the HEI agreement has been in effect for at least 3 years.
The court noted that the lower court initially dismissed the homeowner’s claims under the WCLA because the HEI agreement was an option contract, not a loan.
The court did not point to a specific term of the HEI agreement as the basis for its finding.
['loan'
'mortgage'
'agreement'
'reverse'
'obligation'
'wcla'
'homeowners'
'provider'
'shared'
'equity'
'apprec'
'hei'
'investment'
'court']