Jacques Kallis is often regarded as the greatest all-rounder—and possibly the greatest cricketer—of all time, given his incredible Test record: over 13,000 runs at an average of 55+, nearly 300 wickets, 200+ catches, and 40+ centuries. But why does Sanath Jayasuriya not receive similar recognition in ODIs? After all, his career tally is also extraordinary—13,000+ runs, 300+ wickets, 100+ catches, and a game-changing innovative influence on the format. Is it simply because cricket culture places more value on Test achievements, while equally great feats in ODIs are considered less prestigious?