Although no actual harm had been caused by the first respondent’s conduct, non-compliance with the accounts rules and anti-money laundering regulations carried a potential risk of harm. The touching was unwanted, inappropriate, and sexually motivated, thereby breaching principles 2 and 5 of the SRA Principles. The respondent’s conduct on both occasions had been sexually motivated. Person B had highlighted how the negative effect of the respondent’s conduct had affected both her marital and work relationships. Although there was no actual harm caused by the respondent’s conduct, there was a risk that harm could have been caused.