None
EN
'Zero explanation of what it means': Judge scathingly rubbishes Trump admin's 'unlawful' attempt to block arts funding using 'gender ideology' executive order
['Colin Kalmbacher', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img', 'Height Auto Max-Width', 'Vertical-Align Bottom .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Vertical-Align Middle .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar Is .Alignleft .Alignright']
Law & Crime
Under the terms of the order, Trump directed agencies to "end" the federal funding of, and "ensure grant funds do not promote gender ideology."
"With the Final Notice in effect, projects deemed to promote gender ideology are less likely to be approved for NEA funding," the opinion reads.
To be sure, the Chairperson "will not disqualify a project from consideration solely on [the Chairperson's] conclusion that a proposed project 'promotes gender ideology.'"
From the Court's perspective, these concessions demonstrate that projects deemed to "promote gender ideology" are less likely to receive NEA funding.
In other words, the NEA intends to disfavor applications that promote gender ideology precisely because they promote gender ideology.
['promote'
'notice'
'judge'
'bars'
'order'
'gender'
'attempt'
'ideology'
'arts'
'final'
'funding'
'trumps'
'trump'
'block'
'unlawful'
'scrutiny'
'nea'
'court']