None
EN
Kentucky has kicked people off food benefits using data that doesn’t tell the full story
['News Staff', 'Sylvia Goodman', 'The Associated Press', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img', 'Height Auto Max-Width']
CityNews Halifax
Expert say officials overrely on purchase dataNational legal experts who specialize in SNAP access say an overreliance on transactional data isn’t unique to Kentucky.
She lost her SNAP benefits for a year.
They appear to almost exclusively discuss transactional data, including investigating back-to-back payments, large transactions and whole-dollar purchases.
In 2020, Michigan appellate judges decided transactional data alone is never sufficient to prove that a business — or person — fraudulently used SNAP benefits.
… But cases with non-transactional data are exceedingly rare.”___Associated Press data journalist Kasturi Pananjady contributed to this report.