None
EN
A judge ordered Google to share its search data. What does that mean for user privacy?
['Jaclyn Diaz', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img', 'Height Auto Max-Width', 'Vertical-Align Bottom .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Vertical-Align Middle .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar Is .Alignleft .Alignright']
TPR: The Public's Radio
The most valuable information Google is being forced to share under Judge Amit Mehta’s ruling is users’ click-and-query data.
Instead, Mehta ordered Google to share portions of its incredibly valuable search index and user click-and-query data with some of its competitors.
But it raises a new concern: How to keep Google user data private once it is handed over to third parties.
The data privacy concerns lie entirely with that valuable click-and-query data.
Mehta ordered that these individuals must have expertise in software engineering, information retrieval, artificial intelligence, economics, behavioral science, data privacy or data security.
['google'
'does'
'privacy'
'googles'
'committee'
'judge'
'ordered'
'data'
'users'
'mean'
'information'
'ruling'
'user'
'search'
'share']