None
EN
Comment on When Artists Are Too Old to Be “Emerging” by JMC_artistorian
['Damien Davis', 'More Damien Davis', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img', 'Height Auto Max-Width', 'Vertical-Align Bottom .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar']
Comments for Hyperallergic
My experience with the Van Lier studio residency is a case in point.
Created through the estate of Edward and Sally Van Lier, the Van Lier fellowships were funneled into the New York Community Trust with a clear donor mandate: to support young professional artists from historically underrepresented populations in New York City.
Emerging, mid-career, late-career: the art world tosses these categories around as if they were neutral descriptors.
Van Lier represents the most rigid model: capped at 30, identity-targeted, and bound to donor intent.
If the art world is serious about equity (as it often claims to be), it has to learn from that.
['art'
'old'
'nonlinear'
'programs'
'arts'
'artists'
'world'
'van'
'caregiving'
'emerging'
'lier'
'age']