None
DE
China’s EDA tool restrictions – winners and losers
['Stewart Randall', 'More Stewart Randall', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img', 'Height Auto Max-Width', 'Vertical-Align Bottom .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow .Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar']
TechNode
China actually has more EDA tools companies than the rest of the world combined, with at least 60 such companies.
Having domestic EDA tools is one thing, but whether they are usable and easy to use is another.
OpportunityIn theory then, these restrictions are an opportunity for China’s EDA companies.
These restrictions could therefore be a blessing for China’s EDA companies, while simultaneously being a nightmare for China’s fabless companies.
ConclusionsEDA tool restrictions, if enforced, will be bad for the big three, bad for the Chinese semiconductor industry, but good for China’s domestic EDA tool suppliers.
['losers'
'domestic'
'tools'
'eda'
'chinas'
'tool'
'winners'
'chinese'
'semiconductor'
'technode'
'industry'
'companies'
'china'
'restrictions']