It was thus contended that construing the entire contract as manpower supply was erroneous. Department, argued that the adjudicating authority had considered the documents and correctly concluded that the relevant contracts pertained to manpower supply. The grievance that the entire work had been treated as manpower supply raised disputed questions of fact, not amenable to writ jurisdiction. It is trite law that findings of facts are not liable to be interfered with by a Writ Court under its certiorari jurisdiction. It is perfectly open for the writ court, exercising this flexible power to pass such orders as public interest dictates & equity projects.