ROCHESTER BEACON: Briefly, how do you define crowd-checking, or peer-based fact-checking, and do you see it as a replacement for traditional fact-checking? While I am excited about its potential, I don’t think it is a replacement for traditional fact-checking. Traditional fact-checking is done by well-trained professionals who have a lot to offer while non-professionals are more susceptible to biases. ROCHESTER BEACON: What are the chief shortcomings of traditional fact-checking and how does crowd-checking address those? ROCHESTER BEACON: You have termed misinformation “a grave challenge of our time.” Many people fear it’s a losing battle.