Judge Shipp rejected that argument, finding that delays in litigation—whether tied to bankruptcy stays or other procedural developments—do not, on their own, establish standing to sue. Judge Shipp also noted that the complaint failed to quantify alleged losses, reinforcing the conclusion that the asserted injury was speculative. Judge Shipp found that, regardless of those allegations, the plaintiffs had not shown a present injury traceable to the challenged conduct. Johnson & Johnson continues to maintain that its talc products are safe, do not contain asbestos, and do not cause cancer. v. Red River Talc LLC et al., pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.