None
EN
From definitions to action, how 2012 UGC equity guidelines vary from 2026 regulations
['Abhinaya Harigovind', 'Cdata', 'Var Template_Content', 'Sso_Login_Box', 'Xwelcome Backorenter The Email Address Or Mobile Number Associated With Your Account To Sign In. Show Passwordsign Innew To The Indian Express Signupxcreate Your Account It Is Quick', 'Easy.Or Show Passwordnextvalidate Otpregisteralready Have An Account', 'Signin', 'Sso_Social_Box', 'Sign In Withgmailfacebookapple', 'Var Follow_Widget_Data']
The Indian Express
The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the 2026 University Grants Commission (UGC) equity regulations notified earlier this month, which addresses discrimination, including caste-based discrimination, in higher education institutions.
The new regulations, which replaces the commission’s 2012 equity regulations, sparked protests and calls for their withdrawal among sections of students.
DEFINITIONS OF DISCRIMINATION VS CASTE-BASED DISCRIMINATION:The 2026 regulations defines ‘discrimination’ (section 3(1)(e)) and ‘caste-based discrimination’ (section 3(1)(c)) separately, while the 2012 version defines ‘discrimination’.
If the 2012 Regulations spoke of a more widespread and all-inclusive discrimination, including discrimination in the nature of ragging, why should there be a regression in a protective or ameliorative legislation?” Justice Bagchi asked.
They also suggested that the regulations include OBCs and that the specific aspects of discrimination, as mentioned in the 2012 regulations, be incorporated.