So, Nessel’s lawsuit is based on the same flawed premise deployed in the long-running climate lawfare campaign I’ve written about frequently in recent months. It is also likely to meet the same fate met by at least 10 other state and local claims: Being tossed out of court. Nessel’s suit contends that, were it not for the supposed conspiracy (remember when Democrats used to pretend to hate conspiracy theories?) Michigan would be further along in its transition to weather-dependent alternative energy sources like wind and solar than it currently is. The oil companies didn’t cause that: Business plans that are unsustainable without massive federal subsidies did.