The retraction notice, published November 24, acknowledged the watchdog agency’s retraction request. “Subsequent to the two corrections, concerns have continued to be raised about the study,” the notice states. The retraction published in November “is a long-overdue and necessary step to uphold the integrity of scientific literature,” Aust, Weisshäupl, and Sitte said in their statement. The subsequent expression of concern and retraction notice have not been added to Wiley’s original webpage for the article. At the time of posting, Wiley’s version of the article did not include the retraction notice.