They also stressed that Sir Keir was not involved in the later European Court rulings that expanded investigations into British troops. Sir Keir did not directly represent the claimants, but he did work on related cases and wrote publicly about the legal arguments. Some senior human rights lawyers are saying that describing this role as neutral is misleading. 'The Prime Minister's insistence on neutrality matches his words, actions, and involvements' |The issue is what it says about the Prime Minister's judgment and alignment, whether the Prime Minister's insistence on neutrality matches his words, actions, and involvements. It's about credibility and consistency, on whether the Prime Minister's account can be trusted, especially given his responsibility as Prime Minister for the well-being of the armed forces.