However, the court rejected those arguments, finding that the meeting was called in compliance with the statutory requirements in this area. “PBM met this technical requirement,” the court said — adding that the company also provided shareholders with information for the meeting in compliance with the legislative requirements. “Kaos argued that there is a difference between technical compliance and meaningful compliance,” the court noted. Among other things, the fund argued that the company should have posted a notice on its website announcing the meeting back in mid-December. The [hedge fund] may return to court for relief … if there is any evidence of impropriety,” it said.