“The defendants clearly stated in their defence that the second defendant lacked legal personality as it was not a body corporate and therefore not a proper party. The second defendant is a public body, which is governed by the Education Act. Both the first and second defendants are non-juristic persons and are incapable of being sued. Therefore, the entire proceedings against the first and second defendants are a nullity. There is no legal basis to make any orders against the first or second defendants,” Justice Wint-Blair pointed out.