None
EN
‘Not police officers’: Telangana High Court quashes IPC charges filed by forest officers in 2022 Amrabad assault case
['Rahul V Pisharody', 'Rahul V Pisharody Is Assistant Editor With The Indian Express Online', 'Has Been Reporting For Ie On Various News Developments Telangana Since He Is Currently Reporting On Legal Matters The Telangana High Court.', 'Rahul Started His Career As A Journalist In With The New Indian Express', 'Worked In Different Roles At The Hyderabad Bureau For Over Years. As Deputy Metro Editor', 'He Was In Charge Of The Hyderabad Bureau Of The Newspaper', 'Coordinated With The Team Of City Reporters', 'District Correspondents', 'Other Centres', 'Internet Desk For Over Three Years.']
The Indian Express
The judgment by Justice J Sreenivasa Rao, delivered on January 6, ruled that while forest officials have statutory powers under the Wildlife Protection (WLP) Act, they inherently lack the jurisdiction to investigate or file charges for general penal offences such as assault or criminal intimidation under IPC.
Assault on forest officialsOn March 28, 2022, forest officials of Mannanur range in Amrabad forest division of Nagarkurnool district registered a Preliminary Offence Report (POR) against the petitioners.
The petitioners’ counsel contended that the forest officials have no authority or jurisdiction to conduct investigations into offences under the IPC, and that they are entitled to probe offences under the Wildlife Protection Act.
Subsequently, the court quashed the proceedings to the extent of offences under IPC sections 351, read with 332 and 333.
The court was not inclined to quash the proceedings regarding the offences under sections 27 and 56 of the WLP Act.