None
EN
Don’t cancel people’s jobs over Charlie Kirk even if you support his POV
['John Sandeman']
THE OTHER CHEEK
“Christians should reject calling for callous-death-celebrating-ideologues to lose their jobs or social privileges,” Steenhof writes responding to Charlie Kirk assasination that moved him to tears.
Here’s a thought: Meet awful public speech with better public speech.
But don’t celebrate when they lose their jobs, and don’t advocate for them to lose employment or social rights and benefits.
Obadiah agrees, which is why he thought the motion was a direct negative of the Professor’s motion.
The rules of the Australian Parliament state “An amendment may not be moved if it is a direct negative to the question.
['support'
'peoples'
'cancel'
'speech'
'public'
'kirk'
'women'
'pov'
'conversion'
'negative'
'direct'
'obadiah'
'synod'
'rights'
'dont'
'charlie'
'sydney'
'jobs']